CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST
Gupta Steels Ltd received the Commissioner's order in FORM GST CPD-02 allowing compounding of its offence on 10 March. It had paid the tax, interest and penalty earlier. It did not pay the compounding amount until 20 May. What is the position under the CGST Rules, 2017?
The order becomes vitiated and void. The applicant must pay the compounding amount within thirty days of receiving the order, and failure to do so voids it. The ninety-day period applies to the Commissioner's decision on the application, not to payment.
- AThe order remains valid, with interest on the delay
- BThe order is vitiated and void because payment was not made within thirty days of receipt of the orderCorrect
- CThe order is valid because payment is allowed within ninety days
- DThe Commissioner must extend the time automatically
Explanation
Rule 162(6) requires payment of the compounding amount within thirty days of receipt of the order. Under rule 162(7), failure makes the order vitiated and void. The ninety days relates to the Commissioner's time to decide the application, not the applicant's payment time. 10 March to 20 May exceeds thirty days.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST questions
- Anand Steels Pvt. Ltd. was earlier allowed to compound an offence under section 132(1)(d). Later it is accused of a fresh offence under sect…
- The Commissioner allows Anand Pharma Ltd's compounding application by an order in FORM GST CPD-02 dated 1 March. Anand Pharma had paid the t…
- Kavya Enterprises, Pune, received an order in FORM GST CPD-02 on 10 March allowing its compounding application and specifying the compoundin…
- The Commissioner granted immunity from prosecution to Vihaan Enterprises under Rule 162(3) after compounding. Later it emerges that Vihaan h…
- Mehta Textiles Ltd. was accused of an offence under clause (b) of section 132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. The company has never been allowed t…
- Mehra Traders, Jaipur, is facing prosecution under GST law. It applies to the Commissioner in FORM GST CPD-01 for compounding of the offence…