CS Professional · CSR and Social Governance · CSR Policy
Kaveri Power Ltd is a company covered by Section 135 and has 4 directors on its Board, of which one is independent. The company wants to constitute a CSR Committee. Which composition complies with Section 135(1)?
The Committee must have three or more directors including at least one independent director. Kaveri Power therefore should form a three-member Committee including its independent director. The two-director relaxation applies only to companies not required to appoint independent directors.
- ATwo directors, none independent
- BThree directors, including the independent directorCorrect
- CThree directors, all non-independent
- DFour directors, with the independent director excluded
Explanation
Section 135(1) requires a CSR Committee of three or more directors, with at least one independent director. The two-director proviso applies only to companies not required to appoint an independent director under section 149(4), and Kaveri has one independent director, so the three-director composition with that director is correct.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on CSR Policy shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More CSR Policy questions
- Kaveri Steels Ltd has an unspent CSR amount of Rs 90 lakh for FY ended 31 March, relating to an ongoing project. What must the company do un…
- Veda Textiles Ltd has a net profit of Rs 6 crore in the immediately preceding financial year, so section 135 applies to it. Its CSR obligati…
- The CSR Committee of Narmada Cements Ltd has drafted a CSR Policy. What is the correct sequence of steps under section 135 for the policy to…
- Lakshmi Agro Ltd is covered by section 135(1) but is not required to appoint an independent director under section 149(4). It has only five …
- Sagar Chemicals Ltd failed to transfer Rs 30 lakh required to go to a Schedule VII Fund. Under section 135(7), what is the penalty on the co…
- Meridian Textiles Ltd, a company covered by section 135(1), had average net profit of Rs 40 crore over its three immediately preceding finan…