CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Advance Ruling
Kaveri Textiles Ltd obtained an advance ruling from the Authority for Advance Ruling on the rate applicable to a fabric it manufactures. The jurisdictional officer disagrees with the ruling and wishes to appeal. Which statement follows from the CGST Rules, 2017?
The jurisdictional officer appeals by filing FORM GST ARA-03 on the common portal, and no fee is payable by the officer. The ten thousand rupee fee and FORM GST ARA-02 apply only when the applicant appeals. Officers are expressly allowed to appeal against an advance ruling.
- AThe officer must file FORM GST ARA-03 on the common portal and pay a fee of ten thousand rupees
- BThe officer must file FORM GST ARA-02 and pay a fee of five thousand rupees
- CThe officer must file FORM GST ARA-03 on the common portal and no fee is payable by the officerCorrect
- DThe officer cannot appeal because only the applicant may appeal against an advance ruling
Explanation
Rule 106(2) lets the concerned officer or the jurisdictional officer appeal in FORM GST ARA-03 on the common portal, and no fee is payable by that officer. The ten thousand rupee fee applies only to an applicant's appeal in ARA-02, so the fee option is wrong. Appeal is not limited to the applicant.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Advance Ruling shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Advance Ruling questions
- Anand Traders obtained an advance ruling on the rate of GST on a product it supplies. Its competitor, Bharat Traders, deals in the identical…
- Under the CGST Rules, 2017, regarding who certifies a copy of an advance ruling pronounced by the Authority for Advance Ruling, and the mini…
- Under the CGST Rules, 2017, to whom must a copy of an advance ruling pronounced by the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, duly signed b…
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd obtained an advance ruling from the Authority for Advance Ruling and is dissatisfied with it. Separately, the jurisdicti…
- Himalaya Steels Ltd obtained an advance ruling from the Authority on a supply it makes. Later, the Government amended the law so that the pr…
- Mehta Logistics Pvt Ltd obtained an advance ruling on the GST treatment of a service it supplies. Its competitor, Rathi Carriers, supplies a…