CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
Kaveri Textiles Ltd's financial creditor files a section 7 application. The Adjudicating Authority finds that the proposed resolution professional named in it has a disciplinary proceeding pending against him. What is the legally correct course?
The Adjudicating Authority may reject the application because a disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed resolution professional, but before rejecting it must give the applicant notice to rectify the defect within seven days of receiving that notice. Immediate rejection without notice is not permitted.
- AAdmit the application, since default is established and the creditor's choice of professional is irrelevant
- BReject the application, but only after giving the applicant notice to rectify the defect within seven daysCorrect
- CReject the application immediately without any notice to the applicant
- DAdmit the application and appoint a different professional on its own motion
Explanation
Section 7(5)(b) permits rejection where a disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed professional. The proviso requires prior notice to the applicant to rectify the defect within seven days of receiving the notice. Immediate rejection ignores that proviso.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process questions
- The CoC of Deccan Polymers Ltd resolves under section 54-O to start CIRP, and the Adjudicating Authority passes an order terminating the PIR…
- Himalaya Textiles Ltd filed a Section 9 application. Before filing, Deccan Retail Ltd, the corporate debtor, had sent Himalaya a written not…
- Under Section 8(2)(a), which of the following can the corporate debtor bring to the notice of the operational creditor within the response p…
- Before Tarang Plastics Ltd filed its Section 9 application against Mehta Polymers Pvt Ltd, Mehta had sent Tarang an email disputing the qual…
- Sagar Textiles Ltd receives a Section 8 demand notice from Mehta Dyes for unpaid dyes supplied. Sagar Textiles pays by NEFT within five days…
- The Adjudicating Authority admitted a section 7 application against Sagar Foods Ltd by order dated 10 March. Which statement correctly descr…