CMA Final · Indirect Tax Laws and Practice · Export Promotion Schemes under Foreign Trade Policy
Kaveri Traders failed to pay a penalty of Rs 3,00,000 imposed under the FT(D&R) Act, 1992. Which combination of consequences is supported by Section 11?
Unpaid penalty may be recovered by deduction from money owing, or by customs officers detaining and selling goods as if due under the Customs Act, 1962, with land-revenue recovery as a fallback. The Adjudicating Authority may also suspend the IEC until the penalty is paid.
- ARecovery only as arrears of land revenue; IEC cannot be affected
- BThe Adjudicating Authority may suspend the IEC until the penalty is paid or recovered, and the Director General may have customs officers deduct the amount from money owing to her or detain and sell her goods as if payable under the Customs Act, 1962Correct
- CThe IEC is automatically cancelled permanently and the goods are confiscated
- DRecovery is possible only after a court decree, with no deduction from money owing
Explanation
Section 11(5) lists deduction from money owing, recovery via customs officers by deduction or detaining and selling goods as if payable under the Customs Act, and then the land revenue route if these fail. Section 11(7) allows suspension of the IEC till payment. Permanent automatic cancellation is not provided.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Export Promotion Schemes under Foreign Trade Policy shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Export Promotion Schemes under Foreign Trade Policy questions
- Under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, who may formulate and announce the foreign trade policy, and in what manner?
- Ganga Traders failed to pay a penalty imposed under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Which action is expressly prov…
- Kaveri Software Services of Bengaluru exports IT services and does not claim any benefit under the foreign trade policy, nor does it deal in…
- Sunrise Textiles Ltd, Surat, exported goods worth Rs 4,00,000 in contravention of the foreign trade policy. Under Section 11(2) of the FT(D&…
- Sagar Impex was penalised under the FTDR Act, 1992 and has not paid. Which of the following is a recovery step the Act expressly permits, in…
- Meera Software Pvt Ltd exports software services and takes no benefit under the foreign trade policy. The services are not specified service…