CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Trademarks
Kavita Herbals registered a mark in India and obtained an international registration based on it. Three years after the international registration, the Indian registration was cancelled in respect of all the goods listed. What is the effect on the international registration under the Act?
The protection ceases. Under section 36D(5), if the basic registration is cancelled within five years of the international registration, the protection from the international registration ceases to have effect for the affected goods, regardless of consent.
- AThe international registration continues unaffected because it is independent of the Indian registration after one year
- BThe protection resulting from the international registration ceases to have effect, since cancellation occurred before five years expiredCorrect
- CThe international registration continues but only for the ten-year term and cannot be renewed
- DThe protection ceases only if Kavita Herbals consents to the cancellation
Explanation
Section 36D(5) provides that if, before the expiry of five years of an international registration, the basic registration is withdrawn, cancelled, expired or finally refused for all or some goods, the protection resulting from the international registration ceases to have effect. Cancellation at three years falls within this period. Consent is not required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Trademarks shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Trademarks questions
- Meera Spices has a registered mark. Before Meera files a criminal complaint against Kiran Traders, Kiran has already properly made an applic…
- Goods bearing a mark of Kaveri Foods were seized by the police under the search and seizure power. Ramesh, a trader with an interest in the …
- Meenakshi Textiles Pvt Ltd, an Indian company, is alleged to have falsely applied a registered trade mark to goods, an offence for which the…
- Sundar Sweets Pvt Ltd is held to have committed an offence under the Trade Marks Act. Rajan, a director, proves that the offence was committ…
- Arjun, a citizen of a non-Contracting State, has no domicile in any Contracting State, but runs a small bona fide manufacturing unit in Indi…
- Anand Textiles, registered proprietor of 'ANAND SILK' with its business in Surat, sues in a District Court in Surat for infringement by a Ja…