ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Subsequent events and going concern
Kestrel Ltd has a 31 December 20X5 year end. The auditor signed the audit report on 12 March 20X6. On 20 March 20X6, before the financial statements were issued, the auditor learns that a major customer, whose receivable was included at full value at the year end, went into liquidation on 5 March 20X6 because of conditions that existed at the year end. Which of the following is the auditor's FIRST required action under ISA 560?
The auditor should first discuss the matter with management and those charged with governance and decide whether the financial statements need amending. ISA 560 requires this when a fact emerges after the report date but before issue, and the auditor cannot simply leave the signed report unchanged.
- AIssue the audit report unchanged because it is already signed
- BDiscuss the matter with management and those charged with governance and determine whether the financial statements need amendmentCorrect
- CInclude an Emphasis of Matter paragraph without discussing it with management
- DWithdraw from the engagement immediately and notify the regulator
Explanation
Under ISA 560, facts becoming known after the report date but before the financial statements are issued require the auditor to discuss the matter with management, and determine whether amendment is needed. Leaving the report unchanged ignores a fact that may have existed at the reporting date. Withdrawal is not the first step.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Subsequent events and going concern shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Subsequent events and going concern questions
- Halden Co has a 31 March 20X6 year end. Which of the following events occurring in April 20X6 would normally be an adjusting event requiring…
- Brindle plc's financial statements for the year ended 30 June 20X6 were authorised and issued on 15 September 20X6 with an unmodified audit …
- Kestrel plc's directors have prepared financial statements on a going concern basis. The auditor concludes that a material uncertainty exist…
- Orion Co's directors have prepared financial statements on a going concern basis, but the auditor concludes that the entity will be unable t…
- Brandt Co's financial statements are prepared on the going concern basis. The audit team concludes that the directors intend to cease tradin…
- Kora Co's directors have prepared financial statements on a going concern basis. The auditor concludes a material uncertainty exists, but th…