ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Managing, monitoring and mitigating risk
Kestrel Retail has a minor risk that its store loyalty app will be briefly unavailable. Analysis shows low likelihood and low impact, and the cost of redundant servers would exceed the expected loss many times over. Which statement best describes the appropriate TARA response and the associated governance action?
Accept is appropriate. With low likelihood, low impact and control costs far exceeding the expected loss, the company should knowingly retain the risk. Good governance requires recording the decision in the risk register and monitoring it periodically, rather than ignoring it or spending uneconomically on controls.
- AAvoid, by closing the app, and record it in the risk register
- BAccept, retaining the risk knowingly and monitoring it periodically through the risk registerCorrect
- CTransfer, by outsourcing all IT to remove accountability
- DReduce, by investing in full redundancy regardless of cost
Explanation
Where likelihood and impact are low and control costs exceed benefits, the risk is Accepted. Acceptance should be a conscious, documented decision within appetite, with ongoing monitoring, not neglect. Outsourcing does not remove board accountability and full redundancy is uneconomic.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Managing, monitoring and mitigating risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Managing, monitoring and mitigating risk questions
- Hartwell Retail Ltd's risk manager notes that the ISO 31000 standard on risk management differs from a compliance checklist. Which feature o…
- Marlow Pharma plc is adopting the COSO Enterprise Risk Management framework (Integrating with Strategy and Performance). The chief executive…
- Corvane Retail operates 120 stores. Management wants early warning that store-level controls over cash handling are deteriorating, rather th…
- At Tavira Pharma, the audit committee chair says the board is responsible for determining the nature and extent of the principal risks it is…
- Tarnwell Energy's board reviews risk only once a year through a report prepared by the finance director. Following a major safety incident t…
- Tessling Pharma's audit committee reviews its annual assessment of internal controls. The review finds that controls were well designed, but…