Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Management · Separate legal personality, directors' duties, shareholders and partnerships

Kiran Pharma Pvt Ltd is formed by Mr Kiran only after he signs a non-compete covenant with his former employer, which bars him personally from soliciting its clients. Immediately after, he incorporates the company, which solicits those same clients, claiming the company is a different person not bound by the covenant. In which situation would a court most plausibly disregard the corporate veil?

A court may disregard the corporate veil where the company is a sham or device created to evade an existing personal legal obligation, such as a non-compete covenant. Small size, losses or related directors alone do not justify lifting the veil.

  1. AWhere the company was set up as a sham or device to evade an existing personal legal obligationCorrect
  2. BWhere the company is small and has few shareholders
  3. CWhere the company has made a loss in its first year
  4. DWhere the company's directors are all related to each other
  5. Where the company has only a single class of shares

Explanation

Courts lift the veil where a company is used as a façade or sham to avoid an existing obligation, as in the covenant-evasion scenario. Small size, family directors, losses or one share class do not by themselves justify ignoring separate personality.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Separate legal personality, directors' duties, shareholders and partnerships shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Separate legal personality, directors' duties, shareholders and partnerships questions