CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Law relating to Negotiable Instruments
Kiran signs and delivers to Lata a properly stamped paper, otherwise blank, with the stamp covering Rs. 50,000. Lata fills it in as a note for Rs. 40,000 payable to herself. Under Section 20 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, what is Kiran's position?
Kiran is liable on the instrument. By signing and delivering a stamped blank paper, he gave prima facie authority to complete it for any amount up to the stamp cover of Rs. 50,000, so a Rs. 40,000 note is within that authority.
- AKiran is not liable, because the paper was blank when signed
- BKiran is liable only if the paper was stamped for exactly Rs. 40,000
- CKiran gave prima facie authority to complete the instrument for any amount not exceeding the stamp, so he is liable on it as signedCorrect
- DKiran is liable only after Lata obtains his written consent to the amount
Explanation
Section 20 gives the holder prima facie authority to complete a signed and delivered stamped inchoate paper for any amount within the stamp cover. Rs. 40,000 is within Rs. 50,000, so Kiran is liable in the capacity in which he signed. Against a person who is not a holder in due course, recovery is limited to the amount he intended.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Negotiable Instruments shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Negotiable Instruments questions
- A promissory note is dishonoured and the law requires it to be protested. Which statement about notice correctly reflects the Negotiable Ins…
- Anil, a minor, draws a cheque on his account in favour of Deepa, who endorses it to Farhan for value. The cheque is dishonoured. Which state…
- Ravi Menon signs a promissory note form that is properly stamped but leaves the amount and payee blank, and hands it to Suresh. Under the Ne…
- Rohit Traders holds a bill of exchange drawn on Sameer, who has no known place of business or fixed residence. The bill specifies no place f…
- In an Indian court, a party relies on a bill of exchange governed by the law of a foreign country but leads no evidence on what that country…
- Rohan, a holder, sues Sunil on a promissory note. Sunil denies that Rohan is a holder in due course but gives no proof that the note was obt…