ACCA Applied Knowledge · Financial Accounting · Tangible non-current assets
Kiro Co owns two properties, X and Y, both in the same class of property, plant and equipment. Kiro adopts the revaluation model. Property X was revalued upwards by $50,000 last year. This year Property X has fallen in value by $70,000 below its carrying amount and Property Y has risen by $30,000. What is the charge to profit or loss this year in respect of these revaluations?
The charge to profit or loss is $20,000. The $70,000 fall on Property X is first set against its $50,000 existing surplus, and the excess $20,000 is expensed. Property Y's $30,000 gain goes to other comprehensive income and cannot be netted against X.
- A$20,000Correct
- B$70,000
- C$40,000
- D$0
Explanation
Revaluations are assessed asset by asset. Property X's fall of 70,000 is first set against its own surplus of 50,000 through OCI, leaving 20,000 charged to profit or loss. Property Y's gain of 30,000 goes to the revaluation surplus and cannot be offset against X's deficit. Netting both would wrongly give 40,000 of surplus.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Tangible non-current assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Tangible non-current assets questions
- Brio Co revalues its buildings. On 1 January Year 1 a building had a cost of $500,000 and accumulated depreciation of $100,000, with a remai…
- Harbour Ltd bought a machine for $80,000 plus $4,000 delivery, $2,500 installation and testing, and $1,500 staff training on how to operate …
- Tarn Co's accounting year ends 31 December. Its policy is to charge depreciation monthly from the month of purchase to the month of disposal…
- A company buys a machine for $60,000 on 1 October 20X1. Its policy is straight-line depreciation over 6 years, nil residual value, charged m…
- Under IAS 16, which statement about a company that adopts the revaluation model for a class of property, plant and equipment is correct?
- Zeta Co has a policy of revaluing its land. The land was bought for $200,000 and has never been revalued. It is now valued at $260,000. What…