CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements
Lakshmi Power Ltd, Mehta Steel Ltd and Nair Cement Ltd are all controlled by the same ultimate parent, Omega Group, both before and after Lakshmi Power acquires an interest in a joint operation they share. The common control is not transitory. Which accounting does Ind AS 111 refer to for this acquisition?
Ind AS 111 refers to Appendix C 'Business Combinations under Common Control' of Ind AS 103 for acquiring an interest in a joint operation when all joint controlling parties are under the same ultimate control before and after, and that control is not transitory.
- AInd AS 103 acquisition method, with goodwill measured at fair value
- BAppendix C 'Business Combinations under Common Control' of Ind AS 103Correct
- CInd AS 28 equity method
- DInd AS 109 fair value through profit or loss
Explanation
Ind AS 111 (paragraph B33D) refers to the accounting in Appendix C of Ind AS 103 when the parties sharing joint control, including the acquirer, are under common control of the same ultimate controlling party both before and after, and control is not transitory. The standard acquisition method is wrong because that is not the referred treatment for common control.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements questions
- Epsilon Ltd and Zeta Ltd, both controlled by Promoter Group P, hold joint control of a joint operation. Epsilon acquires an additional inter…
- A finance manager at Omega Ltd says that the Ind AS 111 appendix comparing it with IFRS 11 is binding on preparers. Which statement is corre…
- A student comparing Ind AS 111 with IFRS 11 notes that paragraphs C1A and C1AA of IFRS 11, which relate to transitional provisions, are abse…
- Sigma Ltd, Tau Ltd and Sigma's parent Omega Ltd are under common control of the same ultimate controlling party both before and after Sigma …
- Mehra Ltd holds a 50% interest in an arrangement with Sethi Ltd. The parties have no joint control because Mehra Ltd alone directs the relev…
- Gamma Ltd holds 30% of an entity, but the contractual terms show that no party has joint control and Gamma has no control either. The arrang…