ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Evidence and testing considerations
Larkin Co's year-end is 31 December. The auditor could only attend an inventory count on 6 January, because of a scheduling conflict, and the client's perpetual records are reliable. Inventory is material. The count on 6 January found 12,400 units. Between 1 and 6 January, 900 units were received and 1,500 units were dispatched, all recorded. What quantity should the auditor expect the records to show at 31 December, and what is the auditor's required audit concern about the count date?
The year-end quantity should be 13,000 units, found by working back from the 12,400 counted: subtract the 900 received and add back the 1,500 dispatched. Because the count was after the year-end, the auditor must also test the recorded inventory movements between the count date and the year-end.
- A12,400 units; no further procedures are needed because the count was after year-end
- B13,000 units; the auditor performs procedures on movements between the count date and the year-endCorrect
- C11,800 units; the auditor performs procedures on movements between the count date and the year-end
- D12,400 units; the auditor must withdraw because the count was not on the year-end date
Explanation
Work back from the count: 31 Dec quantity + receipts 900 - dispatches 1,500 = 12,400, so 31 Dec = 12,400 - 900 + 1,500 = 13,000. Check forward: 13,000 + 900 - 1,500 = 12,400. ISA 501 and ISA 330 require procedures on movements between the count and the year-end. The 11,800 option reverses the signs of the adjustments.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Evidence and testing considerations shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Evidence and testing considerations questions
- Kestrel & Co is auditing the receivables ledger of Marlow Ltd. The auditor wants every item in the population to have a known, equal chance …
- The audit team at Delmar Foods Co is considering the sufficiency of evidence for revenue. Risk of material misstatement is assessed as high,…
- During a test of details on sales transactions at Elmcroft Co, the auditor finds one error in the sample that arose because a clerk, on one …
- Brandt & Co audits Tallis Pharma. Management's expert valued a portfolio of patents, and the auditor wants to use this work as audit evidenc…
- When responding to assessed risks for a significant accounting estimate at Barrow Foods, the audit senior lists possible approaches. Under I…
- While auditing Corvin Ltd's revenue, the auditor obtains evidence from two procedures. A confirmation from a major customer states a balance…