Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Audit-related and assurance services

Lumen Partners performs an assurance engagement on Harbor Foods' supply-chain ethics statement. Midway, the engagement partner finds that the client's records are incomplete and the evidence available is not sufficient to support a conclusion, and the limitation is pervasive. Management refuses to provide more. Which action is most appropriate for the practitioner's report?

The practitioner should disclaim a conclusion or withdraw from the engagement. Sufficient appropriate evidence is a required element, and a pervasive scope limitation means possible effects are both material and widespread. A qualified conclusion would suit only a non-pervasive limitation, and an adverse conclusion relates to misstatement rather than missing evidence.

  1. AIssue an unmodified conclusion and mention the incomplete records in an emphasis paragraph
  2. BExpress a qualified conclusion, since only some evidence is missing
  3. CDisclaim a conclusion or withdraw from the engagement, because the scope limitation is pervasiveCorrect
  4. DIssue an adverse conclusion, because the records are incomplete

Explanation

Where the practitioner cannot obtain sufficient appropriate evidence and the possible effects are material and pervasive, the practitioner disclaims a conclusion or withdraws where practicable. A qualified conclusion suits a limitation that is material but not pervasive. An adverse conclusion applies to misstatement, not to a lack of evidence.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Audit-related and assurance services shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Audit-related and assurance services questions