Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Group audits

Marlow Group's auditor sets a threshold above which misstatements identified in components are communicated to the group team, and sets it at an amount that is clearly trivial for group purposes. During the audit, Component Y's auditor finds several errors, each below this threshold. What is the correct group engagement team position?

Items below the clearly trivial threshold need not be reported to the group team, but the threshold must be set low enough that such items would not be material even in aggregate. The group team should still consider qualitative factors and whether the threshold remains suitable.

  1. AThe errors can be ignored, because anything below the threshold is immaterial in every circumstance
  2. BThe component auditor need not report them, but the group team should still consider whether, if they accumulate across components, they might be material, and whether the threshold is appropriately setCorrect
  3. CThe component auditor must adjust the group financial statements directly without telling the group team
  4. DThe errors must be reported to those charged with governance of the component only, never to the group team

Explanation

Misstatements below the clearly trivial threshold need not be accumulated or reported, and the threshold is set so that items below it would clearly not be material even in aggregate. The group team should therefore ensure the threshold is set low enough. Ignoring in every circumstance is too absolute, since qualitative factors can matter. Component auditors do not adjust the group statements alone.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Group audits shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Group audits questions