Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Agency

Marlow Water is a state-owned utility whose board is accountable to a government ministry, regulators, customers and the public. An analyst proposes using a simple shareholder-agent model to assess its governance. Which is the main reason this model is of limited use here?

The simple shareholder-agent model fits poorly because a state-owned utility answers to multiple principals, including government, regulators, customers and the public, whose objectives are varied and often non-financial. Agency theory's focus on a single principal seeking wealth maximisation therefore cannot capture this accountability.

  1. AThere are multiple principals with differing, often non-financial objectives, so the single principal-agent relationship focused on wealth does not fitCorrect
  2. BState-owned bodies have no agents, so agency issues cannot arise
  3. CThe utility has no managers who could act in their own interest
  4. DRegulators are agents of the managers, which reverses the relationship

Explanation

Public bodies answer to many principals with different, often non-financial aims such as service quality and public interest. This makes the simple wealth-maximising principal-agent model a poor fit. Agency problems can still arise because managers may pursue their own interests, so the claim that they cannot arise is wrong.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Agency shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Agency questions