Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Management · Professional negligence

Meera, a consulting actuary in Pune, is engaged by a mid-sized insurer to value its reserves. Her client later alleges she was negligent. Which of the following best describes the standard of care a court would expect from Meera in performing this work?

Meera is judged by the standard of a reasonably competent actuary working in that field. The law does not demand the skill of the most eminent practitioner, nor the care of a layperson, because the duty is measured against ordinary professional competence.

  1. AThe care and skill of a reasonably competent actuary practising in that fieldCorrect
  2. BThe highest level of skill attainable by the most eminent actuary in India
  3. CThe level of care an ordinary layperson would take with their own affairs
  4. DWhatever standard Meera personally promised in conversation, regardless of professional norms
  5. A standard fixed solely by the fee she charged the insurer

Explanation

A professional is judged against the ordinary skill of a reasonably competent member of the same profession in the same field. It is neither the best expert nor a layperson. Fees and casual promises do not set the legal baseline.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Professional negligence shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Professional negligence questions