CMA Intermediate · Business Laws and Ethics · Key Managerial Personnel
Meera, a KMP of Zenith Ltd., fails to disclose her interest in an item of special business in the explanatory statement to a general meeting notice. As a result her relative gains a benefit of Rs 4,00,000. What is the minimum penalty she faces under Section 102(5), in addition to holding the benefit in trust for the company?
The penalty is fifty thousand rupees or five times the benefit accruing, whichever is higher. Five times Rs 4,00,000 is Rs 20,00,000, which exceeds Rs 50,000, so the penalty is Rs 20,00,000. She must also hold the benefit in trust for the company.
- ARs 50,000
- BRs 2,00,000
- CRs 20,00,000Correct
- DRs 5,00,000
Explanation
Section 102(5) imposes the higher of Rs 50,000 or five times the benefit. Five times Rs 4,00,000 is Rs 20,00,000, which is higher than Rs 50,000. Choosing Rs 50,000 ignores the 'whichever is higher' rule.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Key Managerial Personnel shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Key Managerial Personnel questions
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, which of the following is NOT one of the whole-time key managerial personnel that a prescribed class of compa…
- Mr. Rao, a key managerial personnel of Sagar Ltd, bought shares of Sagar Ltd on a forward basis. Based on the Companies Act, 2013 text, whic…
- Which section of the Companies Act, 2013, as originally enacted, prohibited insider trading of securities and has since been omitted w.e.f. …
- Under Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013, what is the penalty on a company that defaults in complying with the section, and on each dire…
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, how must a whole-time key managerial personnel of a company be appointed?
- Rohit is the whole-time company secretary of Alpha Ltd. He is offered a whole-time company secretary post in Beta Ltd., which is not a subsi…