CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · International Law of Arbitration
Meera Textiles seeks enforcement in India of a foreign award. The opposing party proves the award has been annulled in the country in which it was made. Under the Geneva Convention provisions, what follows?
Enforcement shall be refused. Under section 57(2)(a), even if the other conditions are fulfilled, a foreign award annulled in the country where it was made cannot be enforced in India, because the provision is mandatory.
- AEnforcement is discretionary and may be granted if the award is fair
- BEnforcement shall be refused if the Court is satisfied of the annulmentCorrect
- CEnforcement is allowed if the Indian party gives security
- DEnforcement is allowed because annulment abroad has no effect in India
Explanation
Section 57(2)(a) states that even where the section 57(1) conditions are met, enforcement shall be refused if the award has been annulled in the country in which it was made. The word shall makes refusal mandatory, so discretion and security options are wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on International Law of Arbitration shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More International Law of Arbitration questions
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd (incorporated in India) and Weiss GmbH (incorporated in Germany) have a commercial contract with arbitration seated in…
- Zenith Traders (India) resists enforcement of a foreign award made in a notified territory. It proves the award is still open to appeal in t…
- Mehta Infra Pvt Ltd (India) and Brightway Inc (USA) are in an ICC-administered arbitration seated in Chennai, with ICC Rules referred to in …
- Meridian Pharma Ltd (India) and Lakeside Ltd (a UK company) have an arbitration seated in Mumbai. Their contract says the dispute is governe…
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd (Coimbatore) and Brightway GmbH (Germany) agree to arbitrate in Mumbai. Their contract says nothing on the law governing…
- A foreign tribunal seated in a notified territory decided two issues: a price dispute that the parties had referred, and a separate claim fo…