CS Professional · Banking and Insurance - Laws and Practice · Payment and Collection of Cheques and Other Negotiable Instruments
Meera Traders issues a written instrument to Kiran Supplies stating: 'Pay to Kiran Supplies Rs 40,000'. The instrument is a cheque on a bank and contains no words prohibiting transfer. Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, how is this instrument classified as to payability?
The cheque is payable to order. An instrument made payable to a particular person, with no words prohibiting transfer or showing it is not transferable, is treated as payable to order under Section 13, even without the words 'or order'.
- APayable to order, because it names a particular person and has no words prohibiting transferCorrect
- BPayable to bearer, because no 'or order' words appear
- CNon-negotiable, because 'or order' is not written
- DPayable to bearer until the payee endorses it
Explanation
Explanation (i) to Section 13 says an instrument expressed to be payable to a particular person, without words prohibiting transfer or showing intention that it is not transferable, is payable to order. Hence the absence of 'or order' does not make it bearer or non-negotiable.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Payment and Collection of Cheques and Other Negotiable Instruments shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Payment and Collection of Cheques and Other Negotiable Instruments questions
- A bill of exchange payable to order was accepted by Deshmukh Pharma. On the due date, Deshmukh Pharma paid the full amount to the holder, Es…
- In a section 138 trial, the complainant, Anand Finance, files its evidence by affidavit. The accused, Vikas Rao, wants to test the facts in …
- Mehta & Sons holds a promissory note made by Rao Ltd and indorsed to it by Sharma. Mehta & Sons strikes out Sharma's name from the note, int…
- Kavita Textiles holds a cheque payable 'to Ramesh Gupta' with no words prohibiting transfer. It is dishonoured on presentment and later pros…
- Rohan Mehta issued a cheque to Sunita Traders, which was dishonoured for insufficient funds. In the prosecution under section 138 he argues …
- Sundar Exports filed a Section 138 complaint against Alpha Pvt Ltd in a court having jurisdiction under Section 142(2), and it is pending. S…