CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Law of Torts
Meera writes a private letter containing defamatory remarks about Kiran and sends it sealed to Kiran alone. No one else reads it. Kiran sues Meera for defamation. Which element of the tort is missing?
The missing element is publication to a third person. Defamation requires that the defamatory statement be communicated to someone other than the plaintiff. Since only Kiran read the sealed letter, no publication occurred, and a civil action in tort fails on that ground.
- AFalsity of the statement
- BPublication to a third personCorrect
- CReference to the plaintiff
- DIntention to cause injury
Explanation
Publication means communication of the defamatory matter to at least one person other than the plaintiff. A letter read only by the plaintiff is not published, so the tort of defamation is incomplete. Reference to the plaintiff is present since the letter concerns Kiran. Intention is not an essential element of civil defamation.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law of Torts shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law of Torts questions
- Anita owns a farm in Punjab. Neighbour Gurdeep's branches overhang her land by one metre, and Gurdeep also, without permission, walks across…
- Under the rule of absolute liability as laid down by the Indian Supreme Court, which statement regarding the measure of compensation is corr…
- Meena runs a tea stall. A rival opens a stall next door and, by fair competition, takes away most of her customers, reducing her income. Mee…
- A road accident injures Meera when a lorry, left unattended on a slope with its brakes not applied, rolls down and hits her. She cannot show…
- Which of the following statements about the defence of act of God in tort is correct?
- Ravi's neighbour wrongly built a wall that blocks the only light to Ravi's workshop. Ravi wants a court order directing the neighbour to sto…