CA Final · Financial Reporting · Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Meghna Pharma Ltd adopts Ind AS 109 for the first time. At the date of initial application, it assesses whether a debt instrument meets the business model condition for amortised cost under paragraph 4.1.2(a). In earlier years the entity actively traded such instruments, but on the date of initial application its facts and circumstances show a hold-to-collect model. How should the classification be determined?
The classification is based on the facts and circumstances existing at the date of initial application and is applied retrospectively, regardless of the business model in earlier periods. Meghna's earlier trading activity is therefore irrelevant, and the current hold-to-collect model governs the assessment of the amortised cost condition.
- ABased on the facts and circumstances existing at the date of initial application, applied retrospectively irrespective of the prior-period business modelCorrect
- BBased on the prior-period trading business model, applied prospectively only
- CBased on the average business model over the previous three years
- DLeft to management's free choice instrument by instrument, irrespective of the business model
Explanation
Paragraph 7.2.3 states the assessment is made on facts and circumstances existing at the date of initial application, and the resulting classification is applied retrospectively irrespective of the entity's business model in prior reporting periods. The prior trading history therefore does not decide the classification.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities questions
- Godavari Pharma Ltd acquired a business and recognised contingent consideration payable in cash, initially at fair value of ₹8,00,000. At th…
- Godavari Steel Ltd adopts Ind AS 109 for the first time. At the date of initial application, it assesses whether a debt instrument held meet…
- Ind AS 109 states the basis on which an entity classifies financial assets as measured at amortised cost, FVOCI or FVTPL, unless para 4.1.5 …
- Mahanadi Steels Ltd adopted Ind AS 109 from the beginning of its current reporting period. Until the previous year it held a portfolio of go…
- Himalaya Foods Ltd holds a debt instrument whose classification is being determined under Ind AS 109 (no fair value option or para 4.1.5 exc…
- Kaveri Infra Ltd. acquired a business and recognised contingent consideration payable to the sellers, linked to future EBITDA targets, under…