Skip to content

CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · Applicability of Accounting Standards

Meghna Traders Pvt Ltd is an unlisted company that is not a bank or insurer. Its turnover is Rs 40 crore (excluding other income), borrowings are Rs 8 crore, and it has no holding or subsidiary. A senior accountant claims it must prepare a Cash Flow Statement under AS 3 because it is a company. Which statement is correct under the ICAI applicability framework?

Meghna is a Level III entity because turnover of Rs 40 crore is within Rs 50 crore and borrowings of Rs 8 crore are within Rs 10 crore. Level III entities are exempt from AS 3, so preparing a cash flow statement is not mandatory despite being a company.

  1. AAS 3 is mandatory since every company must prepare a cash flow statement
  2. BAS 3 is not mandatory because Meghna is a Level III entity and is exempt from AS 3Correct
  3. CAS 3 is mandatory because turnover exceeds Rs 10 crore
  4. DAS 3 is mandatory only if the company opts for Level I disclosure for borrowings above Rs 5 crore

Explanation

Meghna's turnover Rs 40 crore is not above Rs 50 crore and borrowings Rs 8 crore are not above Rs 10 crore. It is therefore a Level III company, assuming it is not Level I or II. Level III entities are exempt from preparing a cash flow statement under AS 3. The Rs 10 crore figure in the third option is not the relevant turnover threshold.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Applicability of Accounting Standards shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Applicability of Accounting Standards questions