CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · AS 26 Intangible Assets
Mehta Foods Ltd. spent Rs 9,00,000 on a national advertising campaign for a new brand and Rs 4,00,000 on staff training for the launch during 2025-26. Which treatment is correct under AS 26?
Both items are expensed when incurred. AS 26 prohibits recognising internally generated brands and requires advertising, promotional and staff training expenditure to be charged to profit and loss, because the entity cannot reliably separate such costs from the cost of developing the business as a whole.
- ACapitalise both as brand intangible
- BCapitalise advertising only
- CCapitalise training only
- DExpense both when incurredCorrect
Explanation
AS 26 requires advertising and promotional expenditure and training costs to be recognised as expenses when incurred. Internally generated brands are not recognised. Capitalising either would breach the standard.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on AS 26 Intangible Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More AS 26 Intangible Assets questions
- Mehta Textiles Ltd bought a trademark by paying Rs 9,00,000 purchase price, Rs 50,000 non-refundable import duty, Rs 30,000 legal fees for r…
- Rao Software Ltd began developing an accounting package. Expenditure: Rs 8 lakh from April to June (before criteria were met), and Rs 6 lakh…
- Veda Textiles Ltd. incurred Rs 8 lakh on a research phase to find a new dye formula and Rs 12 lakh on a subsequent development phase, after …
- Pragati Ltd. incurred the following during the year: ₹8 lakh on an advertising campaign for existing products, ₹6 lakh on staff training, ₹1…
- Ananya Foods Ltd incurred the following during 2025-26: Rs 9 lakh on staff training, Rs 15 lakh on an advertising campaign for a new brand, …
- Ravi Foods Ltd incurred the following in 2025-26: Rs 4,00,000 on staff training, Rs 6,00,000 on a brand-building advertising campaign, Rs 2,…