CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · Challenge to Award and Appeals
Mehta Infra Ltd challenges arbitrator Mr Rao under the default procedure in Section 13(2). Mr Rao does not withdraw, and the opposing party, Gomti Builders, does not agree to the challenge. Who decides the challenge?
The arbitral tribunal decides the challenge. Section 13(3) provides that unless the challenged arbitrator withdraws or the other party agrees to the challenge, the tribunal itself decides it. Court intervention comes only afterwards, through a Section 34 application against the award.
- AThe arbitral tribunalCorrect
- BThe Court at the seat of arbitration
- CThe Supreme Court directly
- DThe institution that appointed Mr Rao, in every case
Explanation
Under Section 13(3), unless the challenged arbitrator withdraws or the other party agrees to the challenge, the arbitral tribunal decides on the challenge. The Court becomes involved only later, through a Section 34 application after the award, as Section 13(5) provides.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Challenge to Award and Appeals shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Challenge to Award and Appeals questions
- In a dispute between Mehta Textiles and Orion Exports, the arbitral tribunal rules on its jurisdiction. Orion pleaded that the tribunal lack…
- Ganga Power Ltd obtained an interim measure from the arbitral tribunal under section 17 against Himal Cements, and Himal's request to vacate…
- A High Court appellate bench dismissed Bharat Steels' appeal under section 59 against refusal to enforce a foreign award. Bharat Steels wish…
- A foreign award in favour of Himalaya Pharma was challenged by Sagar Chemicals in the seat country, and those proceedings are pending. Himal…
- Delta Pharma Ltd's challenge to arbitrator Ms Iyer under Section 13 is rejected by the tribunal. Delta wants to stop the proceedings and go …
- In an arbitration, claimant Desai Motors withdraws its claim against Verma Autos. Verma Autos objects to termination, showing a legitimate i…