CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST
Mehta Traders applied to the Commissioner in FORM GST CPD-01 to compound an offence under the CGST Rules. The Commissioner allowed the application by an order in FORM GST CPD-02 indicating the compounding amount. Within how many days of receipt of this order must the applicant pay the compounding amount and furnish proof of payment, failing which the order becomes void?
The applicant must pay the compounding amount and furnish proof of payment within thirty days from receipt of the Commissioner's order in FORM GST CPD-02. If payment is not made within this period, the order becomes vitiated and void. The ninety-day period applies to the Commissioner's decision, not to payment.
- AFifteen days
- BThirty daysCorrect
- CSixty days
- DNinety days
Explanation
Under the compounding procedure rules, the applicant must pay the compounding amount within thirty days from receipt of the order and furnish proof of payment. If payment is not made in that time, the order is vitiated and void. Ninety days is the period within which the Commissioner must allow or reject the application, not the payment period.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST questions
- Kapoor Ltd applied for compounding, and the Commissioner granted immunity after Kapoor paid the tax, interest, penalty and the compounding a…
- Gupta Steels Ltd received the Commissioner's order in FORM GST CPD-02 allowing compounding of its offence on 10 March. It had paid the tax, …
- Ananya Traders, a Pune-based registered supplier, applied to the Commissioner for compounding of an offence under GST. The Commissioner call…
- After the Commissioner granted immunity from prosecution to Gupta Metals under Rule 162(3), it came to light that Gupta Metals had concealed…
- Deepak Agro, Indore, was granted immunity from prosecution by an order under rule 162(3) after paying tax, interest and penalty and the comp…
- Sundaram Foods Ltd. was earlier allowed to compound an offence under clause (c) of section 132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. It is now accused o…