Skip to content

CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Pleadings

Mehta Traders sued Kapoor Steels in a civil court for recovery of Rs 8 lakh. Kapoor Steels filed its written statement and wants to claim that Mehta Traders owes it Rs 3 lakh for goods supplied earlier. In pleading terms, how is this claim ordinarily described when it is pleaded as a ground of defence to reduce the plaintiff's demand?

The defendant's claim for Rs 3 lakh against the plaintiff, raised to reduce the plaintiff's recovery suit, is a set-off. It is pleaded in the written statement as a defence to the extent of the cross-demand, unlike a rejoinder, amendment or caveat.

  1. AA set-off, pleaded in the written statement against the plaintiff's claimCorrect
  2. BA rejoinder, pleaded after the plaintiff's replication
  3. CA plaint amendment, made by the plaintiff to reduce the claim
  4. DA caveat, lodged to prevent an ex parte order

Explanation

A cross-demand for an ascertained sum raised by the defendant to reduce or extinguish the plaintiff's money claim is a set-off and is pleaded in the written statement. A rejoinder is a later pleading, an amendment belongs to the plaintiff's own plaint, and a caveat is a pre-emptive notice to the court and has nothing to do with a defence.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Pleadings shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Pleadings questions