CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 40 Investment Property
Meridian Holdings Ltd acquires a company, Skyline Realty Pvt Ltd, whose only significant asset is a rented office tower, together with its employees, leasing processes and property management systems. Management says Ind AS 40 alone governs the transaction because the tower is investment property. What is the correct approach?
Meridian must refer to Ind AS 103 to decide whether the acquisition is a business combination. Ind AS 40 only addresses classification of property, so where the deal is a business combination that includes investment property, both Standards are applied separately.
- AApply Ind AS 40 only, as the main asset is investment property
- BApply Ind AS 103 only, because any acquisition of a company is a business combination
- CDetermine under Ind AS 103 whether the acquisition is a business combination; if so and it includes investment property, apply both Standards separatelyCorrect
- DApply Ind AS 16 since the tower is acquired through a share purchase
Explanation
Whether an acquisition is an asset, a group of assets or a business combination needs separate judgement by reference to Ind AS 103. The guidance on owner-occupied versus investment property does not decide that question. Where the transaction is a business combination including investment property, both Standards are applied separately. Option 2 is wrong as not every acquisition qualifies as a business combination.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 40 Investment Property shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 40 Investment Property questions
- Kapoor Developers holds a commercial building purely to earn rentals, under an operating lease to an unrelated tenant. Separately, it holds …
- Dhanvi Enterprises Ltd owns a building in Chennai. It leases the entire building to its wholly unrelated competitor under a finance lease. D…
- Bharat Developers Ltd bought a plot in Nashik exclusively to develop flats and resell them in the near future. It has no intention to earn r…
- Rohan Ltd leases a warehouse to another entity under a finance lease and also holds a second warehouse it will use for its own future operat…
- Mehta Developers Ltd bought a plot of land exclusively with a view to subsequent disposal in the near future, intending to resell it after o…
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd acquired a plot of land in Pune with the intention of developing it into residential flats and selling them to buyers in…