Skip to content

CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · Prospectus and Allotment of Securities

Meridian Infra Ltd, a public company, makes a public offer. Rohan subscribed on the strength of a statement in the prospectus that the company held a government licence. The statement was untrue. Rohan suffered loss. Which of the following correctly states the liability position under the Companies Act, 2013 for misstatement in a prospectus?

Persons who authorised the issue of a prospectus containing an untrue statement are liable to compensate subscribers who suffered loss relying on it. They can escape only by proving a statutory defence, such as having reasonable grounds to believe the statement was true. The company alone is not the only liable party.

  1. AOnly the company is liable; directors can never be held liable
  2. BEvery person who authorised the issue of the prospectus is liable to compensate for loss, unless he proves the statement was believed true or other statutory defences applyCorrect
  3. CNo one is liable because Rohan could have verified the licence himself
  4. DLiability arises only if the prospectus was also registered as a statement in lieu of prospectus

Explanation

Under the Act, every person who authorised the issue of a prospectus containing an untrue statement is liable civilly to those who subscribed on the faith of it, and may also face criminal liability for fraud-related provisions. Such a person can escape only by proving defences such as a reasonable belief in truth. Option 1 wrongly excludes directors, and option 3 ignores that the investor's reliance is protected.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Prospectus and Allotment of Securities shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Prospectus and Allotment of Securities questions