CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Miscellaneous Provisions (GST)
Meridian Pharma Ltd had a contract entered into before the appointed day. It supplied services under the contract after the appointed day, and the contract price was later revised upwards. Also, for a particular supply, tax was paid both under the State VAT Act and under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (service tax). Which combination is correct under the transitional provisions?
A supplementary invoice or debit note must be issued within thirty days of the upward revision. For a supply taxed under both VAT and service tax, GST is leviable and credit of the VAT or service tax paid is allowed for supplies made after the appointed day, as prescribed.
- AA supplementary invoice or debit note must be issued within thirty days of the price revision; for the dual-taxed supply, tax is leviable under the CGST Act and credit of VAT or service tax paid is allowed to the extent of supplies made after the appointed day, calculated as prescribedCorrect
- BA debit note may be issued at any time; for the dual-taxed supply, no GST is payable at all
- CA supplementary invoice must be issued within sixty days; for the dual-taxed supply, GST is payable but no credit is allowed
- DA debit note is not required because the contract pre-dates the appointed day; for the dual-taxed supply, tax is payable only to the extent of VAT
Explanation
Section 142(2)(a) requires a supplementary invoice or debit note within thirty days of an upward revision, deemed an outward supply under the Act. Section 142(11)(c) says that where tax was paid under both VAT and service tax, GST is leviable and credit of the earlier taxes is allowed to the extent of supplies made after the appointed day, calculated as prescribed. The other options misstate the time limit or the credit.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Miscellaneous Provisions (GST) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Miscellaneous Provisions (GST) questions
- Sunrise Appliances Ltd, Pune, removed refrigerators on payment of excise duty under the existing law three months before the appointed day. …
- Patel Pharma, registered, revised downward the price of goods supplied under a pre-appointed-day contract and issued a credit note within th…
- Under a contract signed before the appointed day, Shree Engineering supplied machinery parts to Kaveri Industries. After the appointed day, …
- Under a contract entered into before the appointed day, Kapoor Engineering supplied machinery parts. After the appointed day, the contract p…
- Ravi Traders, a registered person in Pune, sold goods on approval to Mehta Stores on 10 January, which was two months before the appointed d…
- Rajasthan Tiles Pvt Ltd (registered) had removed goods on payment of excise duty under the existing law three months before the appointed da…