CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Debt Recovery and SARFAESI
Meridian Steels Ltd owes secured debts to two banks, Bank A and Bank B, which have filed recovery applications before the DRT at Pune and the DRT at Chennai respectively. Vistara Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd acquires both financial assets and wants all pending applications heard together. What is the correct course under the SARFAESI Act, 2002?
The asset reconstruction company should apply to the Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction over either DRT where applications are pending. After hearing the parties, that Tribunal may transfer all pending applications to any one DRT. A DRT itself cannot take over another DRT's case.
- AIt may apply to the Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction over either DRT for transfer of all pending applications to any one DRTCorrect
- BIt may apply directly to the DRT at Pune, which can pull the Chennai application to itself
- CIt must withdraw one application and refile it before the other DRT
- DIt may apply to the High Court, as DRTs cannot be consolidated
Explanation
Section 5A allows an asset reconstruction company holding financial assets comprising secured debts of more than one bank, with applications pending before two or more DRTs, to apply to the Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction over any of those DRTs. The Appellate Tribunal may then transfer all applications to one DRT. A DRT has no power to pull cases from another DRT, so the Pune option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Debt Recovery and SARFAESI shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Debt Recovery and SARFAESI questions
- A court decree for recovery of money in favour of a bank was passed in 1998, before the commencement of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks a…
- Vinayak Finance, a financial institution, assigned a defaulted loan to an ARC. The ARC now claims the dues in a DRT application. Under the R…
- The Central Government integrates the registration records of the Motor Vehicles Act and the Registration Act systems with the Central Regis…
- Meridian Traders Ltd, a borrower, receives a bank's reasons for rejecting its objection to a section 13(2) notice, and the bank states it wi…
- Sagar Foods Pvt Ltd received a Section 13(2) notice. Which action by the borrower is restricted by Section 13(13) after receipt of the notic…
- Under SARFAESI, a DRT passes an order under section 17 against borrower Kaveri Textiles Pvt Ltd. The debt claimed by the secured creditor is…