CS Executive · Setting Up of Business, Industrial and Labour Laws · The Apprentices Act, 1961
Meridian Steels Ltd received a notice for failing to engage its required number of apprentices and its explanation was found unsatisfactory. The shortfall continued for five apprenticeship months until seats were filled. Applying the section 30(1A) fine of Rs 500 per shortfall month for the first three months and Rs 1,000 per month thereafter, what total fine applies?
The total fine is Rs 3,500. The first three shortfall months attract Rs 500 each, giving Rs 1,500, and the remaining two months attract Rs 1,000 each, giving Rs 2,000, as section 30(1A) provides.
- ARs 2,500
- BRs 3,500Correct
- CRs 5,000
- DRs 4,000
Explanation
First three months: 3 x 500 = Rs 1,500. Remaining two months: 2 x 1,000 = Rs 2,000. Total = Rs 3,500. Rs 2,500 applies Rs 500 to all five months; Rs 5,000 applies Rs 1,000 to all five months.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Apprentices Act, 1961 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Apprentices Act, 1961 questions
- Kavita, aged 17, wishes to undergo apprenticeship training in a designated trade at Sundaram Engineering Ltd. Under the Apprentices Act, 196…
- Vihaan Textiles Pvt Ltd in Surat engages an apprentice on work that has no connection with the apprentice's training. Under the Apprentices …
- A CS student notes the scope of Section 14 of the Apprentices Act, 1961 (central text). Which statement correctly distinguishes the factory …
- Kiran Engineering in Pune wishes to pay its apprentice Sunil on a piece-rate basis, linking his earnings to the number of components finishe…
- Ravi, a trade apprentice at Kaveri Textiles Ltd, skips the instructional classes frequently but completes all his shop-floor tasks. Which ob…
- Ritu has completed institutional training in a school recognised by the National Council and passed the trade test conducted by that Council…