Skip to content

CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 103 Business Combinations

Meru Textiles Ltd acquired control of Kaveri Dyes Ltd. Meru's management describes the transaction as a 'merger of equals' in which neither party is regarded as the dominant one, and the shareholders of both entities will share control of the combined entity through a joint board. Under Ind AS 103 as notified, how should the transaction be viewed?

The transaction is a business combination. Ind AS 103 defines a business combination as a transaction in which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses, and it expressly includes true mergers or mergers of equals. Management's description does not exclude it, and the form of consideration is irrelevant.

  1. AIt is outside Ind AS 103 because a merger of equals is not an acquisition
  2. BIt is a business combination, because the definition includes true mergers or mergers of equals where an acquirer obtains control of a businessCorrect
  3. CIt is a business combination only if the consideration is paid wholly in cash
  4. DIt must be accounted for as a joint arrangement under Ind AS 111

Explanation

The definition of business combination in Ind AS 103 says a transaction in which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses is a business combination. It expressly adds that transactions sometimes called 'true mergers' or 'mergers of equals' are also business combinations. The label used by management therefore does not take the deal outside the Standard. The form of consideration does not matter.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 103 Business Combinations shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Ind AS 103 Business CombinationsFree diagnostic mock

More Ind AS 103 Business Combinations questions