CA Final · Direct Tax Laws & International Taxation · Taxation of Digital Transactions
Mr. Rao, a resident, transferred his rights in a crypto-mining arrangement to a company incorporated outside India. Through this transfer, he can control the application of the company's mining income. That income, if it were his, would be chargeable to tax. The Assessing Officer deems the income to be Mr. Rao's income and taxes it. Later, the foreign company pays him the same amount as a benefit. Which statement is correct under section 174 of the Income-tax Act, 2025?
The later receipt is not taxed again. Once a person has been charged on income deemed to be his under section 174, the Act says that income, when subsequently received by him in any form, does not again form part of his income.
- AThe amount is deemed his income again when he receives it, since receipt is a separate event
- BThe amount is not deemed to form part of his income again, because it was already charged to tax as deemed incomeCorrect
- CThe section cannot apply because a foreign company is not treated as a non-resident
- DThe section applies even if he proves the transfer was a bona fide commercial transaction not designed to avoid tax
Explanation
Section 174 deems income of a non-resident to be the income of a person who can control its application, and a body corporate incorporated outside India is treated as non-resident. Where the person has been charged on the deemed income and later receives it, it is not again deemed to form part of his income. The section does not apply if he shows to the Assessing Officer's satisfaction that the transfer was bona fide commercial and not designed to avoid tax, so the last option is wrong. The first option reverses the rule against double charge.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Taxation of Digital Transactions shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Taxation of Digital Transactions questions
- During a search at the residence of Ms. Kavya Nair, officers find a crypto wallet holding tokens bought five years ago with cash that was ne…
- On 5 December 2026 (tax year 2026-27) a requisition is made under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for the books of account and digital wallet recor…
- Case: During a search, an officer finds that Meera Traders held a virtual digital asset wallet whose holdings were not recorded in books and…
- A search was initiated on Kabir in the tax year 2026-27, and the last authorisation was executed on 20 August 2026. Under section 301 of the…
- Case: Arjun, a resident, transfers assets to a foreign company through which income becomes payable to the non-resident. By virtue of the tr…
- Case: Kaveri Tech Pvt Ltd, an Indian company, has a US subsidiary. Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, how must gains or losses from foreign exc…