NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-X-A: Investment Adviser (Level 1) · Mutual Funds
Mr. Rohit, aged 40, has a moderate risk appetite. A scheme returned 14% in a year with a standard deviation of 10% and a beta of 1.25. The risk-free rate is 6%. Another scheme returned 12% with a standard deviation of 8% and a beta of 0.80. Using the Treynor ratio, which statement is correct?
The second scheme is better on the Treynor ratio. The first scheme gives (14-6)/1.25 = 6.40, while the second gives (12-6)/0.80 = 7.50. A higher Treynor ratio means more excess return per unit of beta, so the second scheme rewards systematic risk better.
- AFirst scheme 6.40; second scheme 7.50; the second is betterCorrect
- BFirst scheme 0.80; second scheme 0.75; the first is better
- CFirst scheme 6.40; second scheme 7.50; the first is better
- DFirst scheme 8.00; second scheme 6.00; the first is better
Explanation
Treynor = (Return - Rf)/Beta. First: (14-6)/1.25 = 6.40. Second: (12-6)/0.80 = 7.50. The higher ratio shows better return per unit of systematic risk, so the second is better. The 0.80 and 0.75 values are Sharpe ratios (8/10, 6/8), which use standard deviation instead of beta.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Mutual Funds shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Mutual Funds questions
- An investor holds units of an equity-oriented mutual fund and sells them 18 months after purchase at a profit. For tax purposes in India, ho…
- A mutual fund scheme has an NAV of Rs 50.00 per unit and an exit load of 1% applicable if units are redeemed within one year. Ms. Kavita red…
- Which of the following is a feature of a Systematic Transfer Plan (STP) in a mutual fund?
- Mr. Kapoor, aged 35, has a high risk appetite, a 15-year horizon and wishes to invest regularly each month in equity funds to smooth out pur…
- Mr. Arvind Menon, aged 58, wants regular monthly cash flow, has a low risk appetite and a three-year horizon. He asks whether a systematic w…
- Mr. Iyer invested Rs 1,00,000 in a fund. After year 1 the value was Rs 1,20,000 and after year 2 it was Rs 1,08,000, with no interim cash fl…