Skip to content

CA Final · Direct Tax Laws & International Taxation · Aggregation of Income, Set Off or Carry Forward of Losses

Nagar Co-operative Bank amalgamated into Vishwa Co-operative Bank during tax year 2026-27. The predecessor bank has an accumulated loss of Rs 9,00,000 and met the requirement of three years of banking business and holding three-fourths of fixed assets for two years. Which statement about section 118 is correct?

The successor co-operative bank may set off the predecessor's accumulated loss as if the amalgamation had not taken place, provided it holds at least three-fourths of the acquired fixed assets and continues the business for five years. A breach makes the set-off amount taxable income of that year.

  1. AThe successor bank can set off the accumulated loss as if the amalgamation had not taken place, subject to conditions such as holding three-fourths of the predecessor's fixed assets for five yearsCorrect
  2. BThe loss lapses on amalgamation, since only companies get such benefit
  3. CThe successor can set off the loss only if it continues the business for one year
  4. DIf conditions are later breached, the earlier set off is ignored and nothing is taxed

Explanation

Section 118(1) lets the successor co-operative bank set off the predecessor's accumulated loss as if amalgamation had not occurred. Section 118(3)(b) requires holding three-fourths of fixed assets and continuing the business for at least five years. On a breach, section 118(5) deems the set-off amount to be the successor's income of that year, so option D is wrong.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Aggregation of Income, Set Off or Carry Forward of Losses shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Aggregation of Income, Set Off or Carry Forward of Losses questions