CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · Quality Control
Nair & Partners completed the audit of Sundaram Pharma Ltd, a listed company. The EQCR file contains a checklist showing procedures performed and a sign-off dated before the report date. The reviewer's note says one significant judgment on revenue recognition remains unresolved, but the reviewer signed the file anyway to meet the deadline. Which statement is correct under SQC 1?
The documentation is inadequate. SQC 1 requires the file to show that procedures were performed, the review was completed before the report was issued, and the reviewer knows of no unresolved matters suggesting significant judgments or conclusions were inappropriate. The unresolved revenue recognition judgment prevents the third requirement from being met.
- ADocumentation is adequate because the checklist shows procedures were performed and the review was completed on time
- BDocumentation is inadequate because it must show that the reviewer is not aware of any unresolved matters that would cause belief that significant judgments and conclusions were not appropriateCorrect
- CDocumentation is adequate because unresolved matters need to be recorded only for unlisted entities
- DDocumentation is inadequate only because the sign-off was before the report date
Explanation
SQC 1 requires documentation that the procedures required by the firm's policies were performed, the review was completed before the report was issued, and the reviewer is not aware of any unresolved matters that would cause the reviewer to believe the significant judgments and conclusions were inappropriate. Here the first two are met, but the unresolved revenue judgment means the third cannot be truthfully documented. Option D is wrong since sign-off before the report date is required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Quality Control shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Quality Control questions
- Mehta & Associates, a CA firm, is auditing the financial statements of Sundaram Foods Ltd, a listed company. The engagement partner proposes…
- Sharma & Associates, a chartered accountant firm, is the auditor of Meridian Textiles Ltd, a company whose shares are listed on a recognised…
- During the audit of Bharat Agro Pvt Ltd, the engagement partner repeatedly consulted the designated EQCR, Mr. Iyer, and the consultations be…
- Desai & Co. has documented its quality control policies. A senior manager says that communicating them to staff is optional, and that staff …
- Kapoor & Co. is auditing Veda Textiles Ltd, a listed entity. The firm's manual sets criteria for deciding which non-listed audits need an en…
- Mehta & Iyer, a CA firm, is auditing the financial statements of Sundaram Textiles Ltd., a company whose shares are listed on the BSE. The e…