Skip to content

CS Professional · CSR and Social Governance · Partnership Firms

Neha and Omkar, both members of a Hindu undivided family running a family trading business, agree by contract to enter into a separate, single venture of supplying one lot of rice to a government agency and to share its profits. Which statement is correct?

They can be partners in that one venture. A person may become a partner in particular adventures or undertakings, and partnership arises from contract, not status. Their HUF membership only bars partnership in the family business carried on as such, not in a separate contractual venture.

  1. AThey can be partners in that particular venture, since a person may become a partner in particular adventures or undertakingsCorrect
  2. BThey cannot be partners because they belong to an HUF
  3. CThey become partners in the entire family business as well
  4. DThey are partners only if the venture is continuing and not a single adventure

Explanation

Section 8 permits a person to become a partner with another in particular adventures or undertakings. Section 5 bars partnership only in the family business carried on as such. The separate contract for the rice venture creates a partnership limited to it.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Partnership Firms shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Partnership Firms questions