CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement
Nila Chemicals' patent specification was published. After publication, it was allowed to amend the specification by way of disclaimer, decided on 1 September. It sues Pavan Industries for use of the invention in June, before that date. Which statement is correct about damages or account of profits for the June use?
Damages or account of profits for use before the date of the amendment decision are not granted unless the court is satisfied that the originally published specification was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge. The court's power to grant an injunction remains unaffected.
- ANot granted at all, under any circumstances, and an injunction is also barred
- BGranted automatically, since the amendment relates back to the filing date
- CNot granted unless the court is satisfied that the specification as originally published was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledgeCorrect
- DGranted only if Pavan Industries was aware of the patent number in June
Explanation
Section 111(3): where an amendment by disclaimer, correction or explanation is allowed after publication, no damages or account of profits are granted for use before the decision date unless the court is satisfied the original specification was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge. Option 1 is wrong since s.111(4) preserves injunctions and the good-faith exception exists.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement questions
- Dev Agro filed an application and the applicant made no request for examination within the prescribed period; no secrecy direction was issue…
- Rohan Pharma Pvt Ltd filed a patent application. A competitor, Sanjay Labs, which is an interested person and not the applicant, wants the a…
- Arjun Tools sues Bharat Fabricators for patent infringement. Bharat proves that when it made the infringing sales it was not aware and had n…
- Rohan Biotech, a patentee, applies to the Controller under section 57 to amend its specification. Meanwhile, a suit for infringement of the …
- Anita Dynamics Ltd filed an application, and the Controller issued a secrecy direction under Section 35. The direction was later revoked. Re…
- Zenith Agro Pvt Ltd's patent application for a drought-resistant seed treatment was published on 1 March, and no patent has yet been granted…