CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Planning and Strategy

Nila Foods Ltd wants to enter the packaged beverages market quickly. It has surplus cash but no distribution network or brand there. A target, Tara Drinks Ltd, has both but carries large legacy litigation. Which planning approach is most consistent with sound restructuring strategy?

The sound approach is to conduct due diligence, quantify the litigation exposure and then adjust the price or obtain indemnities before committing. This captures the speed and distribution benefits of acquisition while controlling the known legacy risk, instead of ignoring it or refusing inorganic growth.

AAcquire Tara without any investigation to save time
BConduct due diligence, quantify litigation risk, and adjust price or seek indemnities before committingCorrect
CIgnore the litigation since the brand is valuable
DAbandon any external growth and rely only on organic growth regardless of the time cost

Explanation

Acquiring for speed and market access is valid, but known liabilities must be diligenced and reflected in price or contractual protection. Skipping diligence or ignoring litigation exposes the acquirer to loss, while rejecting inorganic growth ignores the stated need for speed.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Planning and Strategy shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Planning and Strategy Free diagnostic mock

More Planning and Strategy questions