CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Board Disclosures and Website Disclosures
Nirmaan Start Pvt Ltd is a recognised start-up company. Its sole officer in default under Section 134 is its managing director. What is the maximum penalty on that officer under Section 446B read with Section 134(8)?
The maximum penalty is Rs 25,000. Section 446B covers start-up companies and limits an officer's penalty to one-half of the specified amount, subject to Rs 1 lakh. Half of Rs 50,000 is Rs 25,000, so that is the ceiling.
- ARs 25,000Correct
- BRs 50,000
- CRs 1,00,000
- DRs 2,00,000
Explanation
The officer's specified penalty is Rs 50,000. Section 446B allows not more than one-half of it, i.e. Rs 25,000, subject to a cap of Rs 1 lakh for an officer. Rs 25,000 is below the cap, so it governs. Rs 50,000 ignores the reduction for start-up companies.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Board Disclosures and Website Disclosures shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Board Disclosures and Website Disclosures questions
- Arjun Motors Ltd, a listed company, has put its policy on directors' appointment and remuneration on its website. The Board's report merely …
- Kaveri Pharma Ltd has uploaded its annual return to its website. While drafting the Board's report, the Company Secretary asks what the repo…
- Arvind Textiles Ltd, a listed company, has a Managing Director, a CEO, a CFO and a Company Secretary, all appointed. Its Board has approved …
- Meridian Steels Ltd is a listed company. Its draft Directors' Responsibility Statement covers accounting standards, accounting policies, ade…
- Veda Textiles Ltd, a listed company, has placed its CSR policy on its website. In preparing the Board's report, the directors want to avoid …
- Meera Foods Ltd's Board report is being finalised. The directors propose to put the risk management policy on the website and cover it in th…