CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing · National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)
Once the National Financial Reporting Authority has initiated an investigation into alleged misconduct of a chartered accountant under Section 132, what is the position regarding proceedings by any other institute or body on the same matter?
Once NFRA has initiated an investigation, no other institute or body may initiate or continue any proceedings on the same matters of misconduct, as provided in the proviso to Section 132(4)(a). NFRA's jurisdiction therefore displaces parallel proceedings by the professional institute.
- AThe institute may continue its proceedings in parallel with the NFRA
- BNo other institute or body shall initiate or continue proceedings on such misconductCorrect
- CThe institute may continue but cannot pass a final order
- DOther bodies may proceed only if the Central Government permits
Explanation
The proviso to Section 132(4)(a) states that no other institute or body shall initiate or continue any proceedings in such matters of misconduct where NFRA has initiated an investigation. Hence parallel proceedings are barred; the option allowing the institute to proceed in parallel is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) questions
- As per section 132(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, the NFRA consists of a chairperson and other members. What is the maximum number of such o…
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, which authority constitutes the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA), and how is this done?
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, which authority has the power to constitute the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA), and by what me…
- A full-time member of the NFRA ceased to hold office on 31 March 2027. Applying the provisos to section 132(3), until what date must he stay…
- CA firm Mehta & Associates is found by NFRA to have committed proved professional misconduct. The minimum penalty NFRA can impose on the fir…
- Under section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013, where is the head office of the NFRA located, and may it meet elsewhere?