CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · Challenge to Award and Appeals
Orion Steel's challenge to arbitrator Mr Bose failed. After the award, Orion's Section 34 application succeeded on the ground of Mr Bose's lack of independence, and the award was set aside. Mr Bose now claims his fees. Under Section 13, what is the position?
The Court may decide whether Mr Bose is entitled to any fees. Section 13(6) gives the Court this power when an award is set aside on the application of the party who challenged the arbitrator. Fees are neither automatically payable nor automatically forfeited.
- AMr Bose is automatically entitled to full fees
- BMr Bose forfeits all fees by operation of law
- CThe Court may decide whether the challenged arbitrator is entitled to any feesCorrect
- DThe other party alone decides the fees
Explanation
Section 13(6) provides that where an award is set aside on an application made under Section 13(5), the Court may decide whether the challenged arbitrator is entitled to any fees. Neither full entitlement nor automatic forfeiture follows by law; the matter is left to the Court's decision.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Challenge to Award and Appeals shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Challenge to Award and Appeals questions
- A High Court appellate bench dismissed Bharat Steels' appeal under section 59 against refusal to enforce a foreign award. Bharat Steels wish…
- A foreign award in favour of Himalaya Pharma was challenged by Sagar Chemicals in the seat country, and those proceedings are pending. Himal…
- Delta Pharma Ltd's challenge to arbitrator Ms Iyer under Section 13 is rejected by the tribunal. Delta wants to stop the proceedings and go …
- In an arbitration, claimant Desai Motors withdraws its claim against Verma Autos. Verma Autos objects to termination, showing a legitimate i…
- Under a contract, Delta Foods Ltd and Asha Traders arbitrate. Asha's challenge to an arbitrator under section 13 failed before the tribunal,…
- Mehta Pharma Ltd and a Singapore firm had an arbitration agreement. Mehta Pharma's application under section 54 asking the court to refer th…