NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors · Mutual Fund Scheme Performance
Over a year, Scheme A earned 14% with a standard deviation of 10%, while the risk-free rate was 6%. Scheme B earned 16% with a standard deviation of 16%. Using the Sharpe ratio, which statement is correct?
Scheme A is better. Its Sharpe ratio is (14-6)/10 = 0.8, while Scheme B's is (16-6)/16 = 0.625. Sharpe measures excess return over the risk-free rate per unit of total risk, so the higher figure signals better risk-adjusted performance despite B's higher raw return.
- AScheme B is better because its return is higher
- BScheme A has a Sharpe ratio of 0.8 and Scheme B has 0.625, so A gave better risk-adjusted returnCorrect
- CScheme A has a Sharpe ratio of 1.4 and Scheme B has 1.0, so A is better
- DBoth schemes have the same Sharpe ratio
Explanation
Sharpe = (return - risk-free) / standard deviation. A: (14 - 6)/10 = 0.8. B: (16 - 6)/16 = 0.625. A is better on risk-adjusted basis. Option 3 wrongly omits the risk-free rate from the numerator.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Mutual Fund Scheme Performance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Mutual Fund Scheme Performance questions
- In evaluating a mutual fund scheme's performance, why is it appropriate to compare an equity large-cap scheme with its declared benchmark su…
- An investor bought units at a NAV of Rs 20 and the scheme paid a dividend of Rs 2 per unit during the year, after which the NAV was Rs 21 at…
- A scheme returned 14%, the risk-free rate is 6%, and the scheme's standard deviation is 10%. Its beta is 0.8 and the market return is 12%. W…
- Which of the following is the most appropriate benchmark-based comparison when judging a large-cap equity scheme's performance?
- A scheme's NAV grew from Rs 25.00 to Rs 36.00 over exactly 2 years, with no dividends. What is the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR)?
- In the context of evaluating a mutual fund scheme, which benchmark choice is most appropriate for a large-cap equity scheme?