ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Taxation (UK) · Appropriateness of planning measures to a taxpayer's circumstances and objectives
Priya, a UK-resident individual, submitted a self-assessment return that understated her tax by £20,000 because she was careless in recording her rental income. HMRC had not contacted her. She later told HMRC about the error voluntarily and gave full co-operation. Based on the standard penalty table for errors, what is the minimum penalty that can apply?
The minimum penalty is £0. A careless error that is disclosed on an unprompted basis carries a minimum penalty of 0% of the tax understated. Priya told HMRC before any contact, so with full co-operation the penalty can be reduced to nil.
- A£0Correct
- B£3,000
- C£6,000
- D£4,000
Explanation
For careless behaviour the minimum penalty for an unprompted disclosure is 0%, and the maximum is 30%. Priya's disclosure was unprompted because HMRC had not contacted her, so with full co-operation the penalty can be reduced to nil. £3,000 is the 15% prompted minimum, and £6,000 is the 30% maximum.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Appropriateness of planning measures to a taxpayer's circumstances and objectives shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Appropriateness of planning measures to a taxpayer's circumstances and objectives questions
- Priya submitted a self-assessment return that understated her income tax by £20,000. HMRC found that she deliberately left out the income bu…
- Which statement about the standard penalty regime for errors in tax returns is correct, based on the penalty table?
- Jonas, an ATX adviser, learns that his client Delta Ltd has filed a corporation tax return that careless staff prepared, understating tax by…
- Rowan failed to take reasonable care and understated tax by £20,000 on his return. He tells HMRC unprompted about the error. Using the stand…
- Which of the following best describes the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion in the context of advising a UK client?
- Mr Shah discovers that his previous year's tax return understated his tax by £20,000 because his adviser was careless. He tells HMRC volunta…