Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Management · Professional negligence

Priya Desai, an actuary, gives a casual opinion on a reserving approach at a social gathering to Rohan, a friend who runs a small insurer. She says clearly that it is an off-the-cuff view and he should seek proper advice. Rohan acts on it and loses money. Which factor most weakens a claim that Priya owed a duty of care?

The informal setting and her express warning show Priya did not assume responsibility for Rohan's reliance. A duty for advice depends on assumed responsibility and reasonable reliance, which her disclaimer undermines, despite her qualification and his loss.

  1. APriya is a qualified actuary
  2. BRohan suffered a financial loss
  3. CRohan actually relied on the comment
  4. DThe setting and her express disclaimer indicate she did not assume responsibility for his relianceCorrect
  5. Priya and Rohan are friends

Explanation

Liability for advice depends on assumption of responsibility and reasonable reliance. An informal setting plus a clear warning to seek proper advice indicates no such assumption, making reliance unreasonable. Qualifications, loss and actual reliance do not by themselves create a duty.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Professional negligence shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Professional negligence questions