CS Professional · Labour Laws and Practice · Law of Industrial Relations
Rajesh, a worker at Vindhya Steels, enjoys under his existing certified standing orders a benefit on a particular matter that is more favourable than what the Code's chapter gives. Which statement is correct?
Rajesh keeps the more favourable benefit. The chapter overrides inconsistent laws and standing orders, but the proviso to section 76(1) protects a worker's more favourable entitlement on a matter, even while receiving other benefits under the chapter.
- AHe continues to be entitled to the more favourable benefit on that matter, even if he gets other benefits under the chapterCorrect
- BHe must switch to the Code's benefit because the Code overrides standing orders in all respects
- CHe may keep the benefit only if the employer consents in writing
- DHe loses the benefit but receives the Code benefit plus compensation
Explanation
Section 76(1) gives the chapter overriding effect over inconsistent laws including standing orders, but its proviso preserves more favourable benefits from any Act, standing orders, award or contract on that matter. This continues even if other benefits are received under the chapter.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law of Industrial Relations shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law of Industrial Relations questions
- A settlement is reached in conciliation proceedings at Narmada Plastics between the company and its workers on shift allowances. Six months …
- The State Government of Gujarat constitutes an Industrial Tribunal under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020. A case on the legality of a st…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd, an industrial establishment to which the lay-off prohibition applies, retrenches Mr. Karthik, a worker whose last dra…
- Sundaram Textiles Pvt Ltd, an industrial establishment to which the standing orders chapter of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 has becom…
- Himalaya Foods Ltd forwarded its draft standing orders to the certifying officer on 1 March. The officer passed no order by 30 April, which …
- Vindhya Cement Ltd and its workers refer a wage-revision dispute to arbitration. The Government is satisfied that the signatories represent …