CS Professional · Banking and Insurance - Laws and Practice · Functions in Insurance and Compliance related thereto (Part V)
Ramesh assigns a life policy to Sunita by a signed, attested endorsement on 1 March. Notice with the endorsement is delivered to the insurer on 10 March. Earlier, on 5 March, he assigned it to Vikram by a separate attested instrument, with notice delivered to the insurer on 20 March. The assignments are absolute. Who has priority, and why?
Sunita has priority because the order in which notices are delivered to the insurer governs priority among assignees, not the order of execution. Her notice was delivered on 10 March, ahead of Vikram's on 20 March. Any dispute on priority goes to the Authority.
- AVikram, because his assignment was executed first
- BSunita, because her notice was delivered firstCorrect
- CBoth rank equally and share the proceeds
- DVikram, because his instrument was a separate document
Explanation
Under Section 38(6), the date on which notice is delivered to the insurer governs priority, and with several instruments the order of delivery of notices decides. Sunita's notice was delivered on 10 March, before Vikram's on 20 March. Execution date is irrelevant to priority.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Functions in Insurance and Compliance related thereto (Part V) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Functions in Insurance and Compliance related thereto (Part V) questions
- The Executive Committee of the General Insurance Council wants to take up a matter incidental to its core functions under section 64L, which…
- Surya General Insurance Ltd proposes to wind up only its marine class while continuing other classes. Under section 58 of the Insurance Act,…
- Metro Surety Services Ltd, an Indian firm that is not an insurer, wants to register under the name 'Metro Insurance Solutions' and run its b…
- Suraksha Life Insurance Ltd. was directed by IRDAI to stop a particular practice under section 34 of the Insurance Act, 1938. Compliance cau…
- The Executive Committee of the General Insurance Council finds that a general insurer is acting in a way prejudicial to the interests of gen…
- Suraksha General Insurance Ltd. has been settling health claims slowly and unfairly. Under the Insurance Act, 1938, the Executive Committee …