CSEET · Business Laws and Management · Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments
Ramesh Traders holds a promissory note stating 'Pay to Suresh Gupta or order'. Another note states 'Pay to Mahesh Rao only, not transferable'. Considering the explanation to Section 13, which statement is correct?
Only the first note is payable to order. An instrument payable to a named person is order paper unless it contains words prohibiting transfer or showing intention that it is not transferable, and the second note contains such words.
- ABoth notes are payable to order
- BOnly the first note is payable to orderCorrect
- COnly the second note is payable to order
- DNeither note is payable to order
Explanation
An instrument is payable to order if it is expressed so or is payable to a particular person and has no words prohibiting transfer. The first note is payable to order. The second contains words prohibiting transfer, so it is not payable to order.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Elements of Law relating to Negotiable Instruments questions
- Match the following. List I: (A) Short title and extent clause, (B) Section 13, (C) Section 53, (D) Section 130. List II: (1) Holder derivin…
- Which of the following is the maximum punishment prescribed by Section 138 for dishonour of a cheque for insufficiency of funds?
- Statement I: The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 extends to the whole of India. Statement II: The Act affects any local usage relating to a…
- Ravi signs the following document in favour of Meena: "I promise to pay Meena Rs. 5,000 and all other sums which shall be due to her." Under…
- Consider the statements about payment time of instruments: (1) A promissory note in which no time for payment is specified is payable on dem…
- As regards its territorial extent, the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 extends to: