CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Laws and Business Communication · Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Ravi buys a machine from Kapoor Engineering. The contract says that the seller gives no implied condition as to fitness, and Ravi signs it. What is the legal effect of this term?
The term is valid. Under the Act, rights, duties or liabilities that would arise by implication of law in a contract of sale can be negatived or varied by express agreement, so the parties may exclude the implied condition as to fitness.
- AIt is valid, because rights, duties or liabilities arising by implication of law may be negatived or varied by express agreementCorrect
- BIt is void, because implied conditions can never be excluded
- CIt is valid only if a court approves it beforehand
- DIt is voidable at Ravi's option, only if the machine proves defective
Explanation
Section 62 allows any right, duty or liability arising by implication of law to be negatived or varied by express agreement, course of dealing or binding usage. The express exclusion is therefore effective. No court approval is required by the section.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Sale of Goods Act, 1930 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Sale of Goods Act, 1930 questions
- Sharma Traders agrees to sell to Mehta Stores 'the Godrej almirah bearing serial number 4471 lying in my showroom'. Without fault of either …
- Dev sold goods to Nisha but retained the goods' documents of title because the price was unpaid. He later pledged the documents to a bank, S…
- Under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, where delivery has been delayed through the fault of the buyer, the goods are at the risk of the buyer as…
- Under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, a contract of sale where the transfer of property in the goods is to take place at a future time or after…
- Under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, a contract of sale is made by:
- Mehta Exports, an unpaid seller, exercises its right of lien over goods sold to Rao Ltd. Rao Ltd. does not pay within a reasonable time. Wha…